The article discusses the concept of political will in the context of regulating social media platforms. It highlights the two main interpretations of political will: one involving state violence to enforce control, and the other focusing on the will of politicians to push through laws or regulations. The authors argue that the will of the people is often used as a justification for imposing the preferences of a specific group on society.

The article also delves into the idea that the will of the people is a myth, as individuals are not homogeneous and numerical majorities can be incoherent. It suggests that liberal social contract theories, such as those proposed by James Buchanan, offer a more realistic approach by focusing on individual consent rather than a collective will. The authors caution against using the concept of political will, as it can be manipulated by state agents for their own benefit.

Overall, the article challenges the notion of political will and emphasizes the importance of individual consent in governance. It suggests that the will of the people is often used as a tool for imposing the preferences of a specific group, rather than representing a true collective will. The authors advocate for a more nuanced understanding of political will and caution against its misuse by state agents.