The article discusses the suspension of rider Tine Magnus and questions the lack of fact-checking and clarity surrounding the case. The author expresses confusion over why Magnus was punished despite not being found guilty of intentionally administering the banned substance Trazodone to her horse. The author calls for a need for an overarching policy framework that acts in the interest of the sport and its participants, rather than its own bureaucratic institution.
The author criticizes the FEI for not considering context in Magnus’ case and calls for a deeper investigation to provide clarity. The complexity of banned substances and the constant risk of contamination in the equestrian sport are highlighted as challenges for riders in understanding and complying with regulations. Top riders have raised concerns about the need for better stable security policies and the inclusion of contamination risks in exclusion criteria within the regulations.
The article concludes by questioning the FEI’s strict zero-tolerance policy on banned substances and the lack of consideration for context in cases like Magnus’. The author highlights the need for clearer rules and policies that take into account the challenges faced by riders in ensuring their horses comply with regulations. The article calls for a more unified and supportive approach from the FEI towards riders in cases involving banned substances.
