The Biden Administration’s new Horse Protection Act rule is criticized for being impractical and overreaching, with concerns that even minor actions could be considered violations. The rule aims to regulate soring in horses, but could negatively impact the equine industry, especially in Texas. The rule would require extensive inspections and strict regulations at horse events, potentially harming owners, trainers, and breeders.

Critics argue that the new HPA rule is a result of government overreach and interference from animal rights extremists. The rule expands the definition of soring to include common practices in the horse industry, such as riding and applying show sheen. The requirement to hire and train inspectors for events is seen as unrealistic and costly, with concerns about staffing shortages and lack of industry knowledge among inspectors.

Opponents of the new rule fear that if not challenged, it could set a precedent for further government interference in other industries, such as farming and pet ownership. The rule is seen as detrimental to the equine industry, responsible horse owners, and rural communities nationwide. Calls are made to push back against the rule and restore common sense to Washington, D.C., with hopes that the incoming Trump Administration will withdraw it.